Lessons We See on Repeat: Early-Stage vs. Later-Stage Startups
If you work with enough startups across stages, you start to notice the same mistakes playing out again and again — different companies, different leaders, but the same themes on repeat.
At Shape & Scale, we’ve seen it all: scrappy teams trying to find their footing, and well-funded later-stage companies trying to scale what worked before. And the truth is, the patterns are remarkably consistent.
Here are the lessons we see most often:
Early-Stage: Underestimating Product Market Fit
The number one mistake we see at the early stage is building a go-to-market (GTM) strategy before you’ve even nailed product-market fit.
We can’t count the number of times we’ve met companies already spinning up elaborate brand campaigns, flashy demos, or expensive marketing motions before building a core product or even validating the need for it. It’s like building scaffolding for a house before laying the foundation.
A few specifics:
Product-market fit first. Everything else is a waste until you know customers want what you’re building AND will buy it. And we mean everything.
Beware the “brand too early” trap. Talking about your product before you’re confident it solves a real problem doesn’t build credibility; it risks destroying it before you even get started.
ROI is non-negotiable. Especially in technology and even AI. The days of vague “magic” demos worked for a time, but it’s quickly coming to an end. Sales cycles are back to several months if not years, and enterprise buyers expect measurable outcomes.
The bottom line is: If you don’t have an actual product that you know is needed in the market, you have bigger fish to fry before worrying about a viral product or company launch.
Later-Stage: The Copy/Paste Trap
Later-stage companies fall into a different trap: trying to copy and paste strategies from past experiences.
It usually looks like a new leader coming in and deciding to replicate whatever worked at their last company — often in a different industry, at a different stage, in a completely different market environment. Nine times out of ten, it doesn’t work.
A few things we’ve noticed:
Context matters. What worked for a Series C SaaS company in 2018 won’t automatically work for an AI infrastructure startup in 2025. While hiring leaders of previous success stories is great to build your bench of expertise, a copy/paste of that previous strategy will never, ever succeed.
Hiring out of order. We’ve seen companies bring in a CMO or VP of Growth when what they really need are doers, agency support, or a flexible bench. Hiring because you “should” versus what the next 12 months demand leads to wasted budget and mismatched expectations.
Trend chasing. Later-stage companies often feel pressured to bolt AI onto legacy products just to stay relevant. Customers see right through it. The strongest teams balance product roadmaps with customer demand, competitive dynamics, and market timing — not hype cycles.
The result is usually bloated orgs, wasted spend, and fragile strategies. We’ve all seen it, and we all know how frustrating it is.
Shortcuts and Shiny Objects Won’t Get You There
Whether you’re pre-Series A or preparing for an IPO, the common thread is simple: sustainable growth requires discipline.
Early-stage teams fail when they sell before they’ve validated. Later-stage teams fail when they assume past playbooks will work again. And across the board, we see founders distracted by the AI arms race — chasing every shiny feature or trend instead of doubling down on what matters.
The companies that stand out resist shortcuts, stay ruthlessly focused, hire intentionally, and build patiently. Because in the end, there are no hacks for building a company that lasts.
Enjoying The Growth Stack? Don’t forget to subscribe for weekly updates straight to your inbox. 📥